centos7在vm中扩展容量
参考:
按照上面的步骤一步一步进行即可,但是,如果是centos7系统,则最后一步非常重要的刷新逻辑分区的步骤,有变化。在原文章中是:
1 | resize2fs /dev/centos/root |
在 centos7 中使用这个命令将出错。解决办法:
resize2fs-bad-magic-number-in-super-block-while-trying-to-open
Finally perform an online resize to resize the logical volume, then check the available space.
1 | xfs_growfs /dev/centos/root |
也就是说 centos7 中使用 xfs_growfs 来刷新容量,而不是resize2fs
fdisk /dev/sda
n –> p –> 3 –> w
重新启动机器
mkfs.ext4 /dev/sda3
vgdisplay 查看 卷名 VG Name
centos
pvcreate /dev/sda3
vgextend centos /dev/sda3
lvextend /dev/centos/root /dev/sda3
xfs_growfs /dev/centos/root
centos 资源下载
1 | yum install vim-enhanced |
查看rpm 包中的内容
rpm -qip *.src.rpm
rpm -ivh *.src.rpm
rpmbuild -bs
tar tvf SOURCES/glibc-2.12-2-gc4ccff1.tar.bz2
linux 相关
Linux系统调用详解(实现机制分析)–linux内核剖析(六)
Hello from a libc-free world! 不使用libc编写代码
The Definitive Guide to Linux System Calls
Linux Systemcall Int0x80方式、Sysenter/Sysexit Difference Comparation
从用户模式到内核模式,windows 平台的实现:
The Sysenter Instruction and 0x2e Interrupt
glibc, man-pages
man-pages有关于 linux 的调用的文档。例如关于 open 函数的文档:
man 2 open
Given a pathname for a file, open() returns a file descriptor, a small, non-negative integer for use in subsequent system calls (read(2), write(2), lseek(2), fcntl(2), etc.). The file descriptor returned by a successful call will be the lowest-numbered file descriptor not cur-rently open for the process.
By default, the new file descriptor is set to remain open across an execve(2) (i.e., the FD_CLOEXEC file descriptor flag described in fcntl(2) is initially disabled; the Linux-specific O_CLOEXEC flag, described below, can be used to change this default). The file offset is set to the beginning of the file (see lseek(2)).
libc 中关于 open 的文档。
The open function creates and returns a new file descriptor for the file named by filename. Initially, the file position indicator for the file is at the beginning of the file. The argument mode (see Permission Bits) is used only when a file is created, but it doesn’t hurt to supply the argument in any case.
可以看到在 man-pages 中对于 open 函数的描述和 libc 文档中的描述,有所不同。man 2 open
中看到的 open 函数,到底是不是 glibc 库提供的 open 函数呢?
从两个方面考虑:
- 查看 man man-pages
System calls: Those functions which must be performed by the kernel.
Library calls: Most of the libc functions.
source
The source of the command, function, or system call.
For those few man-pages pages in Sections 1 and 8, probably you just want to
write GNU.For system calls, just write Linux. (An earlier practice was to write the version number of the kernel from which the manual page was being writ-ten/checked. However, this was never done consistently, and so was probably worse than including no version number. Henceforth, avoid including a version
number.)For library calls that are part of glibc or one of the other common GNU libraries, just use GNU C Library, GNU, or an empty string.
For Section 4 pages, use Linux.
In cases of doubt, just write Linux, or GNU.
由于上面的摘录的信息可知,当调用
man 2 open
查看时,其实查看到的 system call, 即内核提供给用户空间的系统调用。
而 libc 中关于 open 方法的描述有是什么呢?
man syscalls
System calls and library wrapper functions
System calls are generally not invoked directly, but rather via wrapper functions in glibc (or
perhaps some other library). For details of direct invocation of a system call, see intro(2).
Often, but not always, the name of the wrapper function is the same as the name of the system
call that it invokes. For example, glibc contains a function truncate() which invokes the
underlying “truncate” system call.
Often the glibc wrapper function is quite thin, doing little work other than copying arguments
to the right registers before invoking the system call, and then setting errno appropriately
after the system call has returned. (These are the same steps that are performed by
syscall(2), which can be used to invoke system calls for which no wrapper function is pro-
vided.)
Roughly speaking, the code belonging to the system call with number __NR_xxx defined in /usr/include/asm/unistd.h can be found in the kernel source in the routine sys_xxx(). (The dispatch table for i386 can be found in /usr/src/linux/arch/i386/kernel/entry.S.)
通过上面的描述可以看到,通过 syscall 方法进行(man 2 syscall) 的方式,也是间接的系统调用。其实和被 glibc wrapper 过的系统调用函数是相同的。
也可以通过 _syscall 方法,进行直接的系统调用。这样就没有 glibc 对系统调用进行包装了。
syscall 和 _syscall 其自身,其实就是 glibc 提供的两个函数,它们自身并不是 系统调用, 虽然在 man-pages 中它们被归类的 2 这个区域内,但是却只是glibc 提供的普通函数而已。System-Calls
Starting around kernel 2.6.18, the _syscall macros were removed from header files supplied to user space. Use syscall(2) instead. 所以基于内核 kernel 2.6.18 及其以上版本,编译的 glic, 中已经不再提供 _syscall 函数了,所以在代码中也不能使用了。
man 2 intro
中也有关于 系统调用的 说明。
汇编程序的Hello world
为什么 glibc 需要将系统调用进行包装呢?
其内部实现就是把传进来的三个参数分别赋给ebx、ecx、edx寄存器,然后执行movl $4,%eax和int $0x80两指令。这个函数不可能完全用C代码写,因为任何C代码都不会编译生成int指令,所以这个函数有可能完全用汇编写的,也有可能是C用内联汇编写的,
因为,如果想直接调用内核提供的系统调用,则必须,使用 int 指令,进行中断操作。 而对于 c 语言来说,任何c语言代码都无法生成 int 指令的代码,所以当我们使用系统调用的时候,就需要编写 汇编代码 来进行调用。很明显增加了开发的复杂度,同时直接写汇编指令,可能会导致源码级别的不可移植性。
所以,即使我们的程序不需要 glibc 做参数的复制,返回值 errno 的设置,等等通用操作,让 glibc 对 系统调用的汇编代码做一层薄的封装,也是有必要的。这样系统调用就以 c 库函数的形式提供给我们调用,降低了复杂度,增加了可移植性(不用直接写汇编代码)。
那么,到底如何查看,我们所安装的 glibc 的文档呢?
其实在安装 glibc-devel 的时候,这些文件已经被安装了。在路径 /usr/share/info 下面。
1 | # 就可以查看到我们所使用到的 glibc 的真正的文档 |
常用命令
1 | # 查看共享库的导出函数 |